রবিবার, ৩০ জুন, ২০১৩

Deen?s racist wedding fantasy was once a reality

Paula Deen is in trouble. Last month, in a deposition for a discrimination suit brought by an employee, the Food Network star blithely admitted to using racial slurs. Perhaps equally disturbing, she also said she had fantasized about throwing a slavery-themed wedding for her brother, an idea that came to her after eating at a restaurant with an all-black staff.

Deen has apologized, though the Food Network has announced that it won?t renew her contract. Whatever her motivations, she tapped into a long history of slavery fantasy in the United States.

In the years preceding the Civil War, as northern states gradually emancipated their slaves, many expensive hotels in New York and other northern cities made it a policy to hire only black men to wait tables in their dining halls. Although it seems that these waiters were all free men, some may have been only recently emancipated.

The theatrical tradition of blackface minstrelsy developed over the same antebellum decades, feeding a parallel longing for a not-yet-past plantation slavery; New Yorkers could take in a blackface show and then walk down the block for a meal served by black men.

Because New York was a center of the cotton trade, southern cotton merchants and their emissaries spent a lot of time in the city?s hotels. They tended to prefer those staffed by black people, such as the Lafarge House and the Howard House, which could provide a simulacrum of slavery.

Some black waiters, understanding the slave-like implications of their work, rebelled by serving without servility, organizing unions that they hoped would protect their dignity (the first multicity, multiracial waiters? strike was in 1853), and reorganizing their work to try to shed connotations of slavery.

Tunis Campbell, a black abolitionist preacher and headwaiter at various hotels in New York, adapted military drills to the dining room as a way to impose discipline and machine-like regularity. In 1848, he wrote the first textbook on hotel management, in which he stressed the need for black waiters to serve with dignity.

With the coming of the Civil War and southern emancipation, Campbell went south to serve as a Reconstruction-era legislator in Georgia. Up north, however, whites? desire for black service workers who evoked slavery increased. This trend reached its height in the policies of the Pullman Company, which hired white men to construct train cars and black men to staff them as porters and waiters.

When Robert Todd Lincoln (son of the Great Emancipator) became Pullman?s president, he continued the tradition of hiring only blacks. Ironically, Pullman porters were among the most radical, empowered black Americans of their era ? spreading news of northern freedoms to blacks stuck in the Jim Crow South, building a powerful union, sometimes even joining the Communist Party. On the job, however, they were expected to act out the style of servility that had been shaped under slavery.

In the early 20th century, things began to change, but not because of a decline in racism. Instead, hotel and restaurant managers in New York and across the United States began to replace black male waiters with white women. The labor shortages of World War I were an important catalyst for this shift, but managers also stoked and responded to a broader cultural change in taste: Sexiness was now valued above all in the dining experience.

Even as black men disappeared from the dining rooms of restaurants and hotels, they began to appear on food packaging. As Maurice M. Manring has shown in his book Slave in a Box, packaging design and advertising campaigns for syrup and other food products (Aunt Jemima, Uncle Ben?s Rice or Rastus from the Cream of Wheat box) evoked and played on a racist nostalgia for slavery, much like blackface minstrelsy. Although the racial caricature has been toned down, the same characters are still on the packaging of those products today.

For all the horror of Deen?s deposition, we should remember that the remnants of her racist attitudes still surround us, hidden everywhere in plain sight.

Daniel Levinson Wilk is an associate professor of American history at the Fashion Institute of Technology.

Source: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/06/30/3475566/deens-racist-wedding-fantasy-was.html

jessie j jessie j florida lotto Wade Robson powerball numbers American Idol 2013 mega millions

Thousands march in Istanbul in solidarity with Kurds

By Ece Toksabay

ISTANBUL (Reuters) - Thousands of protesters marched to Istanbul's Taksim Square on Saturday chanting slogans against the government and police after security forces killed a Kurdish demonstrator in southeastern Turkey.

The protest had been planned as part of larger unrelated anti-government demonstrations that have swept through the country since the end of May, but became a voice of solidarity with the Kurds after Friday's killing.

"Murderer police, get out of Kurdistan!" some protesters chanted. "This is only the beginning, the struggle continues. The murderer state will pay!"

Turkish forces killed the man and wounded 10 others when they fired on a group protesting against the construction of a gendarmerie outpost in the Kurdish-dominated region.

The incident, in the Lice district of Diyarbakir province, appeared to be the most violent in the region since a ceasefire declaration in March by jailed Kurdish rebel chief Abdullah Ocalan in a decades-old conflict between his fighters and the Turkish state, and it risks derailing the nascent peace process.

Around 10,000 protesters descended on Taksim, which has been the center of weeks of anti-government demonstrations, but were prevented from entering the square by riot police.

Many in the crowd sat in the roads leading to the square after being denied entry. "Long live the brotherhood of the people!" people shouted in both Turkish and Kurdish.

Most of the protesters dispersed after a couple of hours, with a group of around 1,000 remaining near the square. Riot police pushed them away from the square with shields and slow moving water cannon trucks although no water was fired. Announcements were made for protesters to return to their homes.

The Kurdish tensions come at a time of increased vigilance among Turkish security forces after the anti-government protests in Istanbul, Ankara and other cities in which four people have died and thousands have been injured.

The protests, which had largely died down over the past week, have emerged as the biggest public challenge to Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan's 10-year rule. He has dismissed the protesters as pawns of Turkey's enemies and has called supporters to back his party in municipal elections next year.

PROTEST AT FUNERAL

Earlier, hundreds of Kurds chanted anti-government slogans at the funeral of 18-year-old Medeni Yildirim, raising fears of violence at protest marches around the country on Sunday called by Turkey's main pro-Kurdish Peace and Democracy Party (BDP).

The mourners in the city of Diyarbakir warned Erdogan to respect the peace process.

"Behave, Erdogan, don't push us to the mountains!" they chanted - a reference to the camps of Ocalan's Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) in the mountains of northern Iraq from where they used to attack targets within Turkey.

Erdogan tried on Friday to reassure Turkey's Kurds that the anti-government would not harm the peace process.

"The peace process was not affected ... and our brotherhood grew stronger thanks to our people's common sense," he said.

Turkey's Interior Ministry said inspectors would investigate Friday's incident, which it said had involved up to 250 people attacking the construction site. It said the death resulted from warning shots fired to disperse the crowd.

Hours before the killing, the BDP called for marches in three major cities on Sunday to launch a summer of protests to raise pressure on Ankara for reforms under the peace process with the PKK. Leaders said the rallies would be peaceful.

PKK militants began withdrawing from Turkish territory to bases in northern Iraq last month as part of the deal between the state and Ocalan, imprisoned on an island south of Istanbul since 1999, to end a conflict that has killed 40,000 people.

There has been little evidence of progress with attention focused on the countrywide protests.

But the BDP has said the withdrawal was continuing successfully and the process had entered a second stage during which Ankara needed to broaden the rights of Kurds, who make up some 20 percent of the 76 million population.

The BDP protests will call for a halt to the construction of military outposts, the release of political prisoners, education in Kurdish, lowering of the threshold of 10 percent electoral support required to enter parliament, and the release of Ocalan.

The PKK, designated a terrorist group by Turkey, the United States and European Union, took up arms against the state in 1984 with the aim of carving out a Kurdish state, but subsequently moderated its goal to autonomy.

(Writing by Jonathon Burch and Ece Toksabay; Editing by Alison Williams)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/thousands-march-istanbul-solidarity-kurds-185547685.html

kim kardashian pga tour Wendi Deng Sebastian De La Cruz The Last of Us Yeezus Flag Day 2013

শনিবার, ২৯ জুন, ২০১৩

10 Things to Know for Today

1. IMMIGRATION OVERHAUL IN HANDS OF HOUSE

Speaker John Boehner says leaders will craft their own version of the legislation the Senate overwhelmingly passed to give millions in the country illegally a path to citizenship.

2. RETIRED GENERAL REPORTED TARGET OF LEAK PROBE

The investigation of the leaking of classified information about a 2010 cyberattack on Iran's nuclear facilities is focusing on Marine Gen. James "Hoss" Cartwright.

3. OBAMA DOWNPLAYS SNOWDEN SEARCH

The president called the NSA leaker a "29-year-old hacker" and said it wasn't worth wheeling and dealing with other countries to win his extradition to face espionage charges in the U.S.

4. WHAT MANDELA'S DAUGHTER SAYS

Her father is still able to open his eyes and react to family's touch. South Africa's government said his condition is critical but stable.

5. WHO TRAINED BOSTON BOMB SUSPECTS

An indictment against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev suggests the Tsarnaev brothers learned how to make pressure-cooker explosives on the Internet, not from a terror network.

6. OBAMA TRIES TO BUILD AFRICAN LEGACY

The president has been to his father's home continent twice in five years, less frequently than both Bush and Clinton.

7. PROSECUTORS DETAIL CASE AGAINST HERNANDEZ

They say the ex-New England Patriot orchestrated the shooting of Odin Lloyd because he talked to the wrong people at a nightclub.

8. HOW HOT WILL THE WEST GET

Death Valley in California is expecting a high of 124 and some officials worry it might get too hot to fly airplanes.

9. HOSPITALS TRY TO KEEP THEIR HANDS CLEAN

Some are testing a system that uses beepers, buzzers and lights to remind workers to use hand sanitizer and to report those who don't.

10. SURPRISING NBA DRAFT PICK AND TRADE

Anthony Bennett of UNLV was chosen by Cleveland over favored Nerlens Noel, and the Nets and Celtics pulled off a blockbuster trade that gave Brooklyn Kevin Garnett.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/10-things-know-today-101340019.html

Justin Bieber cancer Mockingbird Lane peyton manning sf giants gold rush gold rush windows 8

98% Before Midnight

All Critics (146) | Top Critics (38) | Fresh (142) | Rotten (3)

Hawke and Delpy remain as charming as ever, and their combined goofiness is more endearing than annoying.

Love is messy here, life cannot be controlled, satisfaction is far from guaranteed. Romance is rocky at best. But romance still is.

Though "Before Midnight" is often uncomfortable to watch, it's never less than mesmerizing - and ultimately, a joy to walk with this prickly but fascinating couple again.

"Before Midnight" is heartbreaking, but not because of Jesse and Celine. It's the filmmakers' passions that seem to have cooled.

Before Midnight is fascinating to watch, and so long as Celine and Jesse are communicating, there's still hope.

How (Jesse and Celine) try to rekindle that flame is what drives Midnight, a film that feels so authentic it's like overhearing a conversation you're not sure you should be hearing.

Loving words mix with personal attacks, the magic moments with the unintended slights, as we witness the occasional desperation of imperfect people doing the best they can when life moves beyond meet-cute and courtship. That's authentic.

Linklater and his players bring an end to the fantasy and welcome the thrilling ups and bitter downs of reality to this love story.

Like the first two films, it reflects the real world in a way that seems almost preternatural. It's just that, here, the real world is a harsher, more disappointing place.

The duo, clearly so comfortable in their characters' skin, indulge in intelligent banter, sharp humour and emotional truths.

So much better written than contemporary novels, this film is a literary as well as cinematic achievement to cherish. For grown-ups.

As before, it's often very funny, with Jesse and Celine swapping Woody Allen-esque one-liners - nicely snarky, appealingly abrasive.

The acting, the dialogue and direction are superb.

None of the films is faultless in itself, but, tinted with complementary tones, the complete cycle comes as close to perfection as any trilogy in cinema history.

Marvelous. It's impossible to shake the feeling that we are merely eavesdropping on reality. Witty, wise, and -- most important of all -- truly romantic in ways that movies usually aren't.

It's been 18 years since Hawke, Delpy and Linklater introduced us to Jesse and Celine, and their story just gets richer, funnier and more punchy each time we see them. In 1995's Before Sunrise, they were idealistic 23-year-olds.

Hawke and Delpy are as believably real as any screen couple can ever be.

This is one of the few sequels for which the cliche 'eagerly awaited' is truly applicable.

Predictably, it's just as great as the first two.

By the end, Before Midnight inches towards a dawn of charm. But it's a troubled trip.

As an organic experiment in collaboration between actors and director, it is a triumph, co-created and co-owned by Delpy, Linklater and Hawke.

Hawke and Delpy, who are both credited on the script too, have never found co-stars to bounce off more nimbly or bring out richer nuances in their acting.

The performances and dialogue are wonderfully naturalistic; a reminder that the best special effects are often the cheapest.

Before Midnight is about the nature of long-term relationships, and the way love deepens and grows but also finds itself subject to the complications of maturity. Smart, insightful, and poignant.

For those who witnessed Jesse and Celine's tentative getting together as inter railing students almost twenty years ago, it's reassuring to see them still in love.

Brilliantly directed, superbly written and impeccably acted, this is a thoroughly enjoyable, thought-provoking and emotionally engaging drama that perfectly complements the previous two films.

Source: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/before_midnight_2013/

reddit abc news Boston Police Scanner Jeff Bauman cbs news Boston.com NBA Playoffs 2013

শুক্রবার, ২৮ জুন, ২০১৩

Investigator: No sign progressives mistreated

WASHINGTON (AP) ? The Treasury Department watchdog who detailed Internal Revenue Service mistreatment of tea party groups seeking tax-exempt status says he has no evidence the IRS also mishandled progressive groups' applications.

In a letter obtained Thursday by The Associated Press, the inspector general for tax administration, J. Russell George, acknowledged that the term "Progressives" appeared on a list of terms used by IRS screeners from 2010 to 2012 to look for applicants with potential problems that would merit close scrutiny.

But George said there was no evidence the IRS set aside progressive groups' applications because they appeared on that list.

George said his investigators have "multiple sources of information corroborating," including interviews with IRS employees, emails and other documents, that tea party groups' applications were set aside for care examinations.

But he added, "We found no indication in any of these other materials that "Progressives" was a term used to refer cases for scrutiny for political campaign intervention."

George's letter, dated Wednesday, was sent to Rep. Sander Levin of Michigan, top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee. Levin is among Democrats who have complained that the report George released last month revealing IRS mistreatment of conservative groups unfairly focused on those groups and omitted mention of progressives.

Democrats also have criticized George for not disclosing the inclusion of progressives even though lawmakers asked him about it at hearings.

Levin wrote of "increasing evidence" that George's audit last month "was fundamentally flawed and that your handling of it has failed to meet the necessary test of objectivity and forthrightness."

Some progressive groups seeking tax-exempt status have complained about facing lengthy delays and detailed questions from the IRS.

It is unclear whether progressive groups faced the same extent of mistreatment as conservative organizations. Dozens of them ran into delays exceeding a year, and many received scores of detailed questions that officials have since said were overly intrusive, including demands for information about their donors.

The back-and-forth came as the IRS' acting commission readied for questions from Congress for the first time since revelations that progressives joined the tea party on a list of groups whose applications for tax-exempt status drew extra scrutiny.

Members of the House Ways and Means Committee planned to ask Danny Werfel about the report he issued Monday, six weeks after President Barack Obama named him to head the troubled agency. Werfel wrote that he found mismanagement but no purposeful wrongdoing at the IRS in a report that also pointed to the officials who have been replaced and other changes he has made.

The committee chairman, Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., said Wednesday the report didn't answer key questions Republicans have had about the IRS' screening of conservative groups.

"Who started it? Why was it allowed to go on for so long? Why were conservative groups targeted for their political beliefs?" Camp said.

Democrats seem determined to shift the focus to this week's disclosure that the term "Progressive" was also on the agency's watch lists.

IRS regulations allow tax-exempt social welfare organizations to engage in some political activity but it cannot be their primary mission. The agency must decide whether each applicant's activities meet those vague guidelines.

The IRS has been under withering fire since May 10, when an agency official acknowledged that it had targeted conservative groups seeking tax-exempt designations for tough examinations. Until then, IRS officials had insisted that conservatives had not been singled out for such treatment.

Some Republicans have suggested that the focus on conservative groups came from the White House or other Obama allies.

There has been no evidence of that so far. Instead, according to investigators and testimony from IRS workers to congressional committees, workers in the agency's Cincinnati office that handled tax-exempt applications developed the lists to help them find groups that merited additional scrutiny.

Obama and members of both parties in Congress have said such targeting is inexcusable. At least five top officials, including former acting Commissioner Steven Miller, have been removed.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/investigator-no-sign-progressives-mistreated-132046101.html

mashed potatoes Apple Black Friday how to cook a turkey emma stone Frys tryptophan BestBuy.com

Pujols lifts Angels over Tigers 3-1 in 10 innings

DETROIT (AP) ? Albert Pujols got the biggest hit of the game. Jered Weaver delivered the most encouraging performance, as far as the Los Angeles were concerned.

Pujols hit a tiebreaking double in the 10th inning and the Angels beat Detroit 3-1 on Thursday for their ninth straight victory over the Tigers.

Mike Trout had four hits and was in the middle of the decisive rally for the Angels, who completed a three-game sweep. Weaver pitched seven strong innings in a tight duel with Detroit right-hander Doug Fister.

"Just wanted to concentrate on keeping things simple and keeping the mechanics sound and tried to locate," said Weaver, the staff ace who had struggled since coming off the disabled list.

Making his sixth start since returning from a broken left (non-throwing) elbow, Weaver gave up one run and four hits. He walked two and struck out six.

After the Tigers scored in the second, Weaver allowed only a hit and a walk in his final five innings. He retired his last 13 batters.

"We're confident that he's going to pitch more like he did today than the way he has in a couple of his last starts," Angels manager Mike Scioscia said.

J.B. Shuck singled leading off the 10th against Phil Coke (0-5) and went to third on Trout's single to right field. Pujols sent a drive to deep center, where Austin Jackson tried to make a difficult catch with his back to home plate.

The ball tipped off the webbing of Jackson's glove, hit the wall and trickled to the ground.

"That ball was crushed," Scioscia said.

After an intentional walk to Howie Kendrick loaded the bases, Josh Hamilton made it 3-1 with a sacrifice fly.

"The Pujols pitch wasn't a bad pitch. I think that maybe it wasn't the right pitch in that particular moment," Coke said. "I didn't feel like I made the perfect pitch to him by any means, but the last thing I thought he was going to do is hit it as far as he did. It was away from him. I looked at where (catcher Brayan) Pena was set up and he was going away from Pujols with his glove, going away to receive the ball. He found it with his barrel."

Kevin Jepsen (1-2) worked a scoreless ninth for the win and Ernesto Frieri got three outs for his 19th save in 21 chances.

Neither team could do much against the starters.

Scott Downs replaced Weaver and set down the leadoff man in the eighth. But Downs then allowed Omar Infante's pinch-hit double and hit Jackson with a pitch. Downs was pulled for Michael Kohn, who struck out former Angel Torii Hunter and Miguel Cabrera, both swinging, to end the inning.

"Having a situation with Torii, as clutch as they come, and then you've got the best hitter in the league up next," Scioscia said. "What he did to get out of that eighth inning was huge."

Fister yielded one run and seven hits in seven innings, walking one and striking out four. After the Angels tied the game in the fourth, he gave up only one hit in his final three innings and didn't allow a runner past second.

"He did a tremendous job. The fact that he was able to contain that offense, that shows that he's a good pitcher," Pena said. "He kept us in the ballgame and he gave us a chance to win the ballgame. That's what you ask. He pitched beautifully."

Fister was relieved by Al Alburquerque, who pitched a scoreless eighth. The Angels got runners to second and third with two outs in the ninth against Joaquin Benoit, but he struck out Erick Aybar swinging at a 3-2 pitch to get out of the jam.

Detroit took a 1-0 lead in the second on Brayan Pena's two-out RBI single. It scored Victor Martinez, who singled with one out and went to second when Jhonny Peralta followed with a single.

Los Angeles tied it in the fourth on three consecutive singles to start the inning. Brad Hawpe's single to right scored Hamilton from third. Alberto Callaspo was thrown out at third by Hunter on the play.

NOTES: Los Angeles placed RHP Tommy Hanson on the 15-day disabled list. Hanson was scratched from his scheduled start Wednesday night when he felt tightness in his right forearm while warming up in the bullpen. Scioscia said Hanson (4-2, 5.10 ERA) would have an MRI on Thursday. The team recalled LHP Michael Roth from Double-A Arkansas. ... Detroit RHP Anibal Sanchez, on the 15-day DL with a right shoulder strain, threw to batters before the game. ... Cabrera is the sixth player since 1920 with 1,200 RBIs and 300 home runs in his first 11 seasons. The others were Hank Aaron, Ted Williams, Joe DiMaggio, Jeff Bagwell and Pujols. ... Cabrera went 1 for 4 on Thursday to extend his hitting streak to 12 games, which tied a season high. ... The Tigers begin a three-series road swing this weekend at Tampa Bay. Max Scherzer looks to run his record to 12-0 on Friday night when he faces Alex Colome (1-0, 0.00 ERA). ... The Angels head for Houston, where Jerome Williams (5-3, 3.36) will oppose Astros RHP Bud Norris (5-7, 3.60).

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/pujols-lifts-angels-over-tigers-3-1-10-210840986.html

marchmadness mike d antoni nba trade rumors desean jackson 2012 ncaa tournament schedule laurent robinson dantoni

Stop Attacking Male Writers for Being Sexist

Actor Tom Skerritt (L) and former US Pilot James Salter speak at the IWC Schaffhausen Top Gun Gala Event  during the 22nd SIHH High Jewellery Fair.

Author James Salter has been criticized for the bad behavior of his male characters.

Photo by the Image Gate/Getty Images for IWC

Is it time to stop attacking male writers for being misogynistic if their characters sleep with a lot of people, or not in the right way? Roxana Robinson?s recent attack on James Salter for being a misogynist was infinitely more graceful and nuanced than these sorts of attacks usually are, but the underlying charge that a male writer is sexist if you don?t like their male character is a flawed way to approach the delicate and mysterious possibilities of literature. These sorts of emotionally and politically charged arguments stray too far from the words that are actually on the page, and hold the writer to a standard of behavior that is more suited to who you want to be friends with or sleep with than who you want to read; it becomes character assassination rather than literary criticism.

Robinson writes of Salter?s main character in All That Is: ?Cold and withholding, Bowman?s character denies the deepest and most fundamental aspects of compassion.? She writes that he ?feels entitled to his vindictiveness: He has no scruples and feels no remorse.? She does not, in other words, like him very much.

Of course all of this evokes the recent fracas over Claire Messud?s character being unlikable. Messud implied it was sexist to say a female character should be likable; but Robinson is essentially saying Salter is sexist for his male character being unlikable. Which brings us to the question: Does everyone have to write likable characters? (Robinson seems to think yes, as even Lolita can?t be counted as great literature in her book because Humbert Humbert is not conflicted enough to be sympathetic.) But should our central experience of literature be whether or not we would like to take the protagonist out to dinner? Should we be combing books for friends, or lovers, or even characters whose actions we can wholeheartedly condone?

Writing about feminist literary critics, Joan Didion argues that rigid politics have no place in the free, roaming creative space of fiction: ?That fiction has certain irreducible ambiguities seemed never to occur to these women, nor should it have, for fiction is in most ways hostile to ideology,? she writes in her 1972 essay, ?The Women?s Movement.? Salter?s main character may sleep with a lot of women, but his relation to them is trickier than his sexual history suggests. One of Bowman?s paramours says to him, ?Women are very weak.? And he replies, ?That?s funny. I haven?t found that to be so.?

Here is part of Robinson?s proof of Bowman?s cold, unfeeling nature. When his wife won?t have sex with him: ?He knew he should try to understand, but felt only anger. It was unloving of him, he knew, but he couldn?t help it.? Is every man who feels that particular variety of anger at some point in their life a ?misogynist?? Is admitting the irrational angers and rages that flow through intimate life sexist, or is it the work of literature to show or expose precisely this type of rogue emotional undercurrent? (And as a sidebar: don?t women sometimes feel those kinds of anger too?)

When Kate Millett launched her impressive attack on male novelists for being misogynistic in Sexual Politics, Norman Mailer made a relevant point. He argued that a particularly depressing Henry Miller scene about two men and a hungry prostitute was not a crude celebration of exploitation but an investigation of missed connections, a report from the bleakest frontiers of human loneliness. He argued Miller (and by extension himself, Lawrence, and the others) were often taking on the loneliness in sex as their subject, not just swaggering through an encounter. (And of course one could also argue that swaggering through an encounter is not sexist, always, and women writers have their own versions of this sort of reveling. See for instance Mary McCarthy?s wickedly comic sex scenes.)

One of the important issues is that there is a certain amount of distance between an author and a character. When for instance Salter writes that during Bowman?s wedding, ?Bowman was happy or felt he was,? he is giving the reader a much more complicated and intricate perspective on romantic attachment than Robinson gives him credit for. Salter?s story does not straightforwardly or simple-mindedly endorse all of Bowman?s adventures; it is too cagey, too shrewd, too melancholy for that. Something can be indicted and glamorized at the same time; it can be beautiful and sad.

One of the problems with emotionally fraught criticism is that it often glosses over the words on the page; its loyalty is to some higher interpretation, and it can?t be bothered with small things like the book itself. For instance Robinson writes that Bowman caddishly won?t marry one of his girlfriends: ?She finds him a beautiful house in the Hamptons. He won?t marry her, but he buys the house in both their names.? In fact, Bowman says to Christine, ?It?s going to be very nice living here. We could even get married.? She says, ?Yes, we could.? He says ?Is that an acceptance?? and she hedges. It is she who doesn?t want to marry him, and she who won?t commit. In fact their relationship falls apart because she cheats on him and takes him to court to get the house he bought for them to live in, claiming that he bought it for her, and not for them together. To interpret this affair as Bowman?s crass philandering is to very creatively and deliberately skew the text, to subdue story to idea. I bring this up only to point out the dangers inherent in ideological readings, the somewhat flimsy relation they often have to anything the reader might recognize as the book itself.

Robinson?s main (and most powerful) condemnation of Bowman is ?there is no conflict in this human heart.? But Bowman is conflicted, complicated, though it is true that unlike a male protagonist in a book by a younger male writer, like Jeff Eugenides or Michael Chabon he does not often talk directly or muse endlessly about this conflict. To argue that a conflict doesn?t exist because it is not put into words directly, analyzed with agonizing precision, effusively, guiltily mulled over, would be an error in judgment; it overlooks the great varieties of psychological composition and style. Salter writes conflict, he just writes it more subtly, more indirectly, more in the style of a Hemingway reader, than a post-feminist English major; he shades it in. To ask Bowman?s World War II veteran to speak effusively about his feelings (and to compare him, as Robinson does, to Iago if he doesn?t) is to fundamentally misunderstand the nuances and varieties of the human heart.

To read a book with true openness or receptiveness, we have to let Salter?s character be his character, not a character so upstanding, so compassionate, we would want to marry him ourselves. One of the dangers of rigid politicized reading is that it imposes the ideas of the critic on the novelist, it asks the novelist to dream up a person acceptable to the critic, not a person who acts freely in their own world. One could even argue that an important benefit of fiction is that you learn about other kinds of people, alien people, people you don?t already understand or necessarily relate to, people you don?t like. You hear messages from a different kind of consciousness.

Another fallacy of this type of angry reading is that it often conflates the author with the character. In writing about his character?s relation to love, Robinson says, ?What Salter does is reveal his own incapacity for that huge and engulfing passion.? Is she really trying to argue that Salter himself, that 88-year-old man with the straw hat and twinkling eyes, currently in a long-term attached relationship, by all accounts, is incapable of love? The capaciousness of this indictment reveals some sort of animus against a slippery archetype of the badly behaved man that defies the intellectual neatness of the argument. The elevation of Bowman to a full-scale Shakespearean villain, rather than a guy sort of sadly and sometimes joyously muddling through, reveals perhaps not enough conflict in the critic?s own ?human heart.?

Source: http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/roiphe/2013/06/james_salter_author_of_all_that_is_is_not_a_sexist.html

us news law school rankings gael glen rice jr bars lindzi cox bachelor finale courtney robertson

মঙ্গলবার, ১৮ জুন, ২০১৩

'Curb Your Enthusiasm' actor Jeff Garlin arrested

LOS ANGELES (AP) ? Los Angeles police say "Curb Your Enthusiasm" actor and comedian Jeff Garlin has been arrested on a felony vandalism charge after a dispute with another motorist over a parking space.

Police Sgt. Harry Rosenfeld says the 51-year-old actor was arrested for allegedly smashing the windows of the other person's car. Rosenfeld says officers arrested Garlin in Studio City on Saturday.

Garlin was jailed on $20,000 bail. It wasn't clear from the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department's website if he had been released. Garlin's publicists didn't immediately respond to phone and email messages Sunday.

Garlin played Larry David's friend and manager on "Curb Your Enthusiasm" and was the show's co-executive producer. He's also appeared frequently on "Arrested Development" and numerous other television shows.

TMZ first reported his arrest.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/4e67281c3f754d0696fbfdee0f3f1469/Article_2013-06-16-US-People-Jeff-Garlin/id-0fe8b5ccafa9468fb2117862d47706ee

Adrienne Maloof Telemundo real housewives of beverly hills Pink Floyd 12 12 12 Concert amazing race Cam Cameron

সোমবার, ১৭ জুন, ২০১৩

Turkish police clear Gezi Park on eve of pro-Erdogan rally

Riot police moved into Istanbul?s Gezi Park with tear gas and water cannons on Saturday night. In less than an hour they managed to clear the park at the center of Turkey?s protest movement.

Shortly before 9:00pm when police began their operation, the park and adjacent Taksim Square were packed with thousands of celebrants. With live music, barbeques, and street venders, the protest had the atmosphere of a summer festival.

Demonstrators had been expecting security forces to attempt to clear the park, but despite police warnings shortly before they began their advance, most people assumed it would come in the early morning hours when there are less people in the park. As a result many people were caught off guard, including parents with young children and elderly people.

Although the raid succeeded in clearing out the park, the brutal police methods, which have long been a core protester grievance, have galvanized many to continue their anti-government demonstrations. Now many fear the country may see a steady escalation in violence with neither side showing any willingness to back down.

?A movement has started and I think it will continue. Although cops are aggressive everyday we will continue,? says Mumu, medical student helping protesters who like many people interviewed asked only to use his nickname due to safety concerns. ?I don?t know what?s going to come next. I don?t even want to think about it, but I?m worried the cops will use real pistols.?

RECOMMENDED: Think you know Turkey? Take our country quiz.

Protests began two weeks ago when police used excessive force to break up a peaceful sit-in opposing a commercial development that would replace Gezi Park. The park remains an issue, but demonstrations now center on anger with Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who protesters accuse of behaving more like an authoritarian than a democratically elected leader.

Mr. Erdogan had agreed to postpone development of the park until the courts determined its legality. But in a speech to members of his Justice and Development Party (AKP) on Saturday he said the park must be ?evacuated.? Hours later security forces moved on the park, triggering some of the most violent clashes seen in Istanbul over the past two weeks.

As protesters fled a police onslaught, security forces used tear gas, percussion grenades, and water cannons to push thousands of demonstrators away from the park. Amid the flight, demonstrators tried to slow police by pushing trashcans, tables from nearby restaurants, and a host of other objects into the street, setting many of them ablaze.

By the end of the night, protesters had scattered throughout the city and clashes with police continued until the early morning hours, with some still going on after sunrise.

?It will be a failure tonight, but not in the long-term,? says Yigit, a bank employee among the protesters. In what may become a rallying point for many people, Yigit also expressed frustration about police carrying out the raid when the park was filled with many people who hadn?t come to clash with police.

?We all were expecting something like this, but not today when it was the most crowded with civilians. I saw mothers, children, and disabled people in the park,? he says.

Numerous demonstrators who fled the park in the initial chaos of the police raid described seeing young children separated from their parents and elderly people unable to quickly escape the gas fired into the park. Police also fired tear gas into the lobby of the nearby luxury Divan Hotel where a number of protesters had taken refuge to escape the violence.

The excessive force used by police to break up the original sit-in at Gezi Park is among the main reasons listed by many Turks to explain why they joined in calls against the government. Consequently, the clearing of Gezi Park will likely add fuel to the protest movement.

?This is what we are against, the extreme police response so we will continue protesting,? says Merih, a banker. ?The only one who can stop this is the prime minister and he does not want to. In fact he is doing the opposite.?

Erdogan has met with members of the protest movement, but so far has yet to offer any significant compromises beyond a referendum to determine the park?s future. Those in the park met the referendum with much skepticism, many saying they worried that voting would not be fair.

Violence and clashes are likely to continue and possibly intensify on Sunday. Yesterday, demonstrators had already begun calling for a million people to march to Taksim Square on Sunday. Meanwhile, supporters of Erdogan, who have thus far staged few public rallies in Istanbul, had also been planning their own demonstration.

?We have demands, but we don?t know what?s going to happen because no one in the government is going to step back,? says Ezgi, a translator.

RECOMMENDED: Think you know Turkey? Take our country quiz.

Related stories

Read this story at csmonitor.com

Become a part of the Monitor community

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/turkish-police-clear-gezi-park-eve-pro-erdogan-125822554.html

revolution Family Guy Boston Marathon huffington post What is ricin Boston Marathon Explosion Boston Marathon bombing new york times